Founded in 1991, the Republican Liberty Caucus works to advance the principles of limited government, free markets and individual liberty within the Republican Party.

I consider myself to be socially conservative in my personal beliefs. I’m not about to marry a man, encourage my daughter to have an abortion, picket a military recruiting office or smoke marijuana. But I am also a libertarian, so I do not believe in using the power of government to force my values on other people. I hope and believe that as a group the Republican Liberty Caucus shares this perspective and that our members understand that like the Republican party we are a “big tent” with room for anyone who agrees with our core principles of limited government, free markets and individual liberty.

The RLC is not just a bunch of Libertarians who got tired of the bickering in the Libertarian Party. Many of us are long-time Republicans who are inspired not by Ayn Rand or Murray Rothbard or the modern gurus of the libertarian movement, but by the fundamentally conservative belief in liberty which descends from enlightenment conservatives like Edmund Burke and the founding fathers and was reinforced by the great leaders of the Republican party like Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan.

Reagan described his own philosophy of government as libertarian and he saw no conflict between his libertarian beliefs and his personal moral principles. Like many Republicans he understood that there are separate spheres for the political and the personal. The RLC operates in the political sphere and is not in the business of advocating for or against any moral belief held by any individual. While it is true that we do not believe that it is the role of the federal government to legislate morality, that also means that as a group we do not advocate or oppose any position on personal moral, religious or social issues. There are other groups both inside and outside the GOP which address those issues quite well without our help.

The RLC has many members whose personal values tend towards the socially conservative, but they still share a belief in the principles of limited government, free markets and individual liberty. We welcome them into our chapters because their beliefs do not conflict with our core principles. By the same measure we also welcome members whose personal beliefs tend to be more socially liberal. If we have differences on some social issues we can put those aside because it is more important to work together on the larger issues which we share in common.

Our nation is in peril and our most precious rights are threatened. Government is out of control and must be returned to the principles on which it was founded. Achieving this is the mission of the RLC and if it is your mission, then that should override all lesser issues and we ought to be able to find common ground and work together, because none of us will be able to live the way we want — whatever our personal social and moral beliefs — if we are no longer free.

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the RLC.
  • http://www.libertarianrepublican.blogspot.com Eric Dondero

    Well stated. That is precisely the tact RLC should take: Socially tolerant, but recognizing personal views of RLC members who tend towards social conservatism (Pro-Life, anti-Gay Marriage, ect…) are entirely welcome and can even be consistent with libertarian ideals.

  • Gary Aminoffg

    Very well stated. That is exactly the position a libertarian should take.

  • http://www.republicofdave.com Dave Nalle

    Thanks guys. If we want to succeed as an organization we need to focus on basic principles and try to not get bogged down in hot-button issues which are matters of personal morality.

    Of all people Joe Scarborough — who is sounding more and more libertarian — made this point very well earlier today when he told Chris Matthews that while he was in Congress he voted on abortion maybe twice out of thousands of votes, yet that issue disproportionately consumed the campaigning time resources and money of too many in Congress on both sides, when it’s basically a state and personal issue and one in which Congress really shouldn’t have any role in the first place.

    Dave

  • Matt Heath

    Well spoken!

  • http://www.rlc.org/2009/08/25/kristi-dunn-rlcer/ Kristi Dunn: “What Attracted Me to the Republican Liberty Caucus” | Republican Liberty Caucus

    [...] Let me state clearly, I consider myself to be socially conservative in my personal beliefs. I’m not about to marry a woman, encourage anyone to have an abortion, picket a military recruiting office or smoke marijuana. But I also do not believe in using the power of government to force my values on other people. In other words, the government was never meant to be the social conscience of the nation. Often Republicans wish to pick and choose what issues they wish government to be involved in. This is a mistake because it gives the government a foothold. It allows them to go the direction we believe is right, or to rule against us and take the nation down a different path. Leaving these freedoms in the hands of the people and the states protects us from giving away our liberties at a national level. (Partial Source: http://www.rlc.org/2009/06/08/social-values-and-the-rlc/.) [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus