<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Republican Liberty Caucus &#187; Ron Paul</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlc.org/category/elections/ron-paul/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlc.org</link>
	<description>The Conscience of the Republican Party</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:31:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Rand Paul&#8217;s Practical Philosophy</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2010/05/24/rand-pauls-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2010/05/24/rand-pauls-philosophy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 03:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RLC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=2277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="diggthisplugin" style="float: right; width: 42px; padding-right: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><iframe src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.php?u=http://www.rlc.org/2010/05/24/rand-pauls-philosophy/&t=Rand Paul&#8217;s Practical Philosophy&k=#FFFFFF" scrolling="no" style="border: none; height: 80px; width: 52px;"></iframe>
		</div><p><span style="font-size: small;">This video is from Jack Hunter, a conservative commentator and columnist. We&#8217;ll let the video speak for itself.</span></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/INbEJnddUds&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/INbEJnddUds&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2010/05/24/rand-pauls-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Victories for Supported Republican Liberty Caucus Candidates</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2010/05/19/big-victories-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2010/05/19/big-victories-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 16:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RLC Chapter News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RLC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=2241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="diggthisplugin" style="float: right; width: 42px; padding-right: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><iframe src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.php?u=http://www.rlc.org/2010/05/19/big-victories-2010/&t=Big Victories for Supported Republican Liberty Caucus Candidates&k=#FFFFFF" scrolling="no" style="border: none; height: 80px; width: 52px;"></iframe>
		</div><p><span style="font-size: small;">Three U.S. Senate candidates who have been endorsed by the Republican Liberty Caucus are well on their way to securing victories in November.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">First, <a href="http://www.toomeyforsenate.com/">Pat Toomey</a> won an easy victory last night in his race and will face Congressman Joe Sestak in November.  Toomey, while more of a social conservative generally, has a proven record of voting for less government.  His new opponent, Sestek, is telegenic and has a heavy populist streak, so Toomey will have to energize his base while also reaching out to independents and moderates to win in the swing state of Pennsylvania.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.mikelee2010.com">Mike Lee</a> is now in a run-off with Tim Bridgewater in the Republican U.S. Senate primary in Utah, which will be decided by Utah Republican Party voters on June 22.  Lee&#8217;s opponent Tim Bridgewater is someone that has been running for various positions locally for quite some time. Like Lee, he is concerned about too much government interference, but his policy solutions are different. Specifically, Mr. Bridgewater believes in more U.S. intervention abroad and much more federal involvement in immigration. After looking at the issue pages of their websites again, I have no doubt that Mike Lee is the solution-focused leader that Utah needs in the Senate. Which is why the Republican Liberty Caucus endorsed him, along with his commitment to limited government.</span></span></span></p>
<p><img src="http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/5/19/1274231603632/Rand-Paul-006.jpg" alt="http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/5/19/1274231603632/Rand-Paul-006.jpg" /></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Most importantly, <a href="http://www.randpaul2010.com/">Rand Paul</a> is the Republican nominee in Kentucky. Dr. Paul gained nearly 60% of the vote in his primary yesterday. He will face Attorney General Jack Conway in November. While watching the fair and balanced news last night, I already saw various left-wing pundits excited that Rand Paul was the victor so they could start attacking his views.  Will the Tea Party and the Liberty Movement have the power to take Rand to the finish line?</span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">These candidates, while not perfect, are our best hope to achieve liberty in the coming years. With these three committed small government advocates in the Senate, our country will be much better off.  Work tirelessly to support them in the coming months.<br />
</span></span></span></span></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2010/05/19/big-victories-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maine Republicans Adopt New Platform with Help from Ron Paul Delegates</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2010/05/10/maine-platform-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2010/05/10/maine-platform-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 16:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GOP Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=2123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="diggthisplugin" style="float: right; width: 42px; padding-right: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><iframe src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.php?u=http://www.rlc.org/2010/05/10/maine-platform-2010/&t=Maine Republicans Adopt New Platform with Help from Ron Paul Delegates&k=#FFFFFF" scrolling="no" style="border: none; height: 80px; width: 52px;"></iframe>
		</div><p><span style="font-size: small;">I wasn&#8217;t at the Maine Republican Party Convention this weekend, so it&#8217;s hard for me to comment on what occurred.  From the accounts I have read, it appears that some of the constitutionalist wing of the Republican Party (Ron Paul supporters, mostly) &#8212; including some Tea Party activists &#8212; felt unrepresented at the previous Maine Republican Party Convention and planned to make themselves a known quantity at the Convention this weekend.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">They did so by organizing in advance. Several of them made it onto the Platform Committee and several others had proposed changes to the platform that would strike moderate phraseology and replace it with more hard-line stances. I commend these activists for actually working to change the Republican Party from within. That&#8217;s the mission of the Republican Liberty Caucus!<br />
</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">About 1,800 folks attended the Convention, so for the Ron Paul faction of the party to have any impact at all shows just how much influence Ron Paul and the Tea Parties have had over the Republican Party in the past two years. </span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">The platform now features:</span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">- A declaration of state sovereignty<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- A call for the passage of “read the bill” legislation<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- Opposition to the fairness doctrine<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- Opposition to the Employee Free Choice Act<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- Investigation of global warming shenanigans<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- Balancing the federal budget and paying off debt<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- A call for Auditing the Federal Reserve<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- Rejecting cap and trade<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- Freezing future stimulus payments<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- Institute zero based budgeting<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- A statement that health care is not a right<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- Eliminating the Department of Education<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- Prohibiting funding for ACORN or like organizations<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- Opposition to any and all treaties with the United Nations<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- The passage of a Congressional reform act, including:<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">&#8230;.. o 12 year term limits for all members of Congress<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">&#8230;.. o Removal of Congressional pensions<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">&#8230;.. o Forcing Congress to participate in Social Security and health care (the same system we use)<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- &#8220;Freedom of religion does not mean freedom from religion&#8221;<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- Nativist anti-immigrant language, including the removal of Maine’s “sanctuary state” status<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- A declaration to &#8220;Seal the Borders&#8221;<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- a statement that marriage should be between a man and woman<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- &#8220;Return to the principles of Austrian economics&#8221;<br />
<span style="font-size: small;">- Resisting the creation of “one world government”</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">At first glance, this seems like a major victory, but hold on.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Republican Liberty Caucus of Maine Chairman Ken Lindell and former RLC National Committeeman Matt Gagnon (who hails from The Pine Tree state) both find several problems with the platform overhaul.  I do, too.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">According to Lindell, a former Maine State Representative, &#8220;There is a whole lot of stuff in the new platform that I really like and really dislike. It would have been better if the Platform Committee had done its job and taken the proposals for changes to the platform seriously. The end result would have been better written and more presentable.&#8221;  Although he does conclude, &#8220;I think that it is a very positive development that activists who are new to the party have been able to succeed where earlier they were simply ignored and dismissed.&#8221;</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Says Gagnon: &#8220;It is very obviously slapped together, and almost entirely Federally focused in nature.  I do not believe this platform gives very many reasons at all for Maine voters to vote for the Republican Party.&#8221;</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">I agree with my colleagues. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">But more importantly, when did gay-bashing, a fence along the border, or religious dogma become part of the movement for less government and more freedom? </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Ron Paul supporters should respect Ron Paul&#8217;s original positions on these issues:</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">1) Homosexuals are fellow human beings who should be afforded equality under the law.<br />
2) Immigrants should be respected with the same dignity we afford other Americans; people should be free to seek out better lives for themselves and their families; the problem is with the entitlement society that has been fostered by decades of government dependency.<br />
3) Religion is a private matter that should be kept out of government.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">I would have preferred the platform without the last six points mentioned above. I don&#8217;t know how returning to Austrian economics is possible when our country has never been guided by Austrian economics.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Overall, the platform is a step in the right direction, but it still not a libertarian document.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2010/05/10/maine-platform-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Liberty Caucus Endorses Kentucky Candidates</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2010/04/28/rlc-kentucky-endorsements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2010/04/28/rlc-kentucky-endorsements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RLC Chapter News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RLC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State races]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=2043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="diggthisplugin" style="float: right; width: 42px; padding-right: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><iframe src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.php?u=http://www.rlc.org/2010/04/28/rlc-kentucky-endorsements/&t=Republican Liberty Caucus Endorses Kentucky Candidates&k=#FFFFFF" scrolling="no" style="border: none; height: 80px; width: 52px;"></iframe>
		</div><p><span style="font-size: small;">The Republican Liberty Caucus National Board confirmed the following endorsements at our Board meeting yesterday.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">The endorsed candidates include: <a href="http://www.elect-brett.com/" target="_blank">Brett Gaspard</a> (District 69) and <a href="http://timforkentucky.com/" target="_blank">Tim Fairfield</a> (District 78) for State Representative; <a href="http://cathyflaig.com/" target="_blank">Cathy H. Flaig</a> (Boone County) and <a href="mailto:johnriley@bellsouth.net">John Riley</a> (Spencer County) for Judge Executive; <a href="http://www.petegarrett.com/" target="_blank">Peter Garrett</a> for Campbell County Commissioner; and <a href="http://cindyrichforpva.com/About%20Me.html" target="_blank">Cindy Arlinghaus Rich</a> (Incumbent) for Boone County Property Valuation Administrator.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">These endorsements are in addition to our previous endorsement of <a href="http://www.randpaul2010.com/" target="_blank">Dr. Rand Paul</a> for U.S. Senate in the May 19 Kentucky primary.  Good luck to these candidates!</span></span></span></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2010/04/28/rlc-kentucky-endorsements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Rand Paul Will Win In Kentucky</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2010/04/19/why-rand-paul-will-win-in-ky/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2010/04/19/why-rand-paul-will-win-in-ky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rand paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="diggthisplugin" style="float: right; width: 42px; padding-right: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><iframe src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.php?u=http://www.rlc.org/2010/04/19/why-rand-paul-will-win-in-ky/&t=Why Rand Paul Will Win In Kentucky&k=#FFFFFF" scrolling="no" style="border: none; height: 80px; width: 52px;"></iframe>
		</div><p>This article is a <em>Republican Liberty Caucus</em> exclusive by <span style="font-style: italic">Wes Messamore</span>. If you like what you&#8217;re reading, please check out my <a href="http://www.humblelibertarian.com" target="_self">blog</a>.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>As a huge fan and supporter of Rand Paul&#8217;s father, Texas Congressman Ron Paul, I was thrilled to learn that his son was considering a U.S. Senate run for what would turn out to be an open seat in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.</p>
<p>Months ago, when Rand Paul&#8217;s U.S. Senate campaign wasn&#8217;t yet a campaign, just a fledgling exploratory committee by a &#8220;long-shot&#8221; candidate from Bowling Green, Kentucky, he still managed to win an online poll at a Kentucky news website. When I heard about that online poll at a Ron Paul message forum, I turned out with a thousand other &#8220;Paulians&#8221; and voted for Rand.</p>
<p>Living just an hour away from his headquarters, I had a chance not very long thereafter to meet with Rand personally, and during our conversation, someone mentioned his poll victory. Rand- with his characteristically dry sense of humor- shrugged and said that would be fantastic if he was running to win the <span style="font-style: italic">Internet&#8217;s</span> vote&#8230; he&#8217;d be Kentucky&#8217;s next Senator for sure.</p>
<p>His point was well-made. Much of Rand Paul&#8217;s early support predictably surged from young, web-savvy, libertarian-leaning activists who supported Rand&#8217;s father Ron Paul. While their support was welcome, it would have been hardly enough to get Rand Paul where he is today.</p>
<p>Now Rand leads all his major challengers in state-wide polls, is closing in on $3 million in funds raised, and has the endorsements of big names like Sarah Palin, Steve Forbes, and Reagan PAC. How did Rand Paul&#8217;s campaign manage to gain so much ground, putting it in striking distance of electoral victory?</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-style: italic">Because my grandma supports him.</span></strong> The secret to Rand Paul&#8217;s success is not that he resonates with people like me, but that he resonates with people like my grandmother. I&#8217;m a young, enthusiastic libertarian Republican; she&#8217;s a traditional, conservative, Reagan Republican- and Rand Paul&#8217;s message speaks to her.</p>
<p>Originally from Oklahoma, my grandmother has lived in the Bluegrass State now for longer than I have been alive. Her father was a staunch Democrat and all four of his children, including my grandmother, became Republicans during the Reagan years, when the two parties experienced a major realignment.</p>
<p>She started listening to Rush Limbaugh during the Clinton years- and still does. She loves Glenn Beck, she voted for Bush both times, and she even has a crush on Dick Cheney (but you didn&#8217;t hear it from me). She thinks and feels like most Kentucky Republicans do about what&#8217;s best for her state and what&#8217;s best for the country.</p>
<p>Rand was right those many months ago when he implied that kids like me who supported his father are a poor barometer for his success in Kentucky&#8217;s upcoming U.S. Senate election. It is not the Internet that will sweep him to victory, but Kentucky&#8217;s registered Republicans like my grandmother- the <em>perfect</em> barometer for Kentucky opinion.</p>
<p>The Paul family message of fiscal conservatism, strict constitutionalism, and principle over party has reached beyond the Internet and college campuses, and swept into the hearts of the people who were inspired by the Reagan revolution of the 1980s, and <span style="font-style: italic">that&#8217;s</span> why he will win.</p>
<p>Rand Paul will be the next U.S. Senator representing Kentucky. Not because I support him, but because my grandma does. And when he gets there, he may just be the one of the very best Senators this country has ever had.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2010/04/19/why-rand-paul-will-win-in-ky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Panel votes to advance Ron Paul&#8217;s Audit the Fed amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/19/financial-svcs-committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/19/financial-svcs-committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banking & the Fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="diggthisplugin" style="float: right; width: 42px; padding-right: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><iframe src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.php?u=http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/19/financial-svcs-committee/&t=House Panel votes to advance Ron Paul&#8217;s Audit the Fed amendment&k=#FFFFFF" scrolling="no" style="border: none; height: 80px; width: 52px;"></iframe>
		</div><p><span style="font-size: small;">According to <em>Bloomberg News</em>, the House Financial Services Committee today, in a 43-26 vote and a second voice vote, attached a Fed-audit amendment to legislation creating a council of regulators to monitor systemic risk. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">According to Dr. Paul, the bill, HR 3996, if passed, will grant sweeping new powers to the Federal Reserve. However, at least with his amendment attached, it won’t be acting in secret anymore.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">The panel’s vote increases the possibility that Congress will reverse the ban on audits of interest-rate decisions. The broader bill on financial regulation is subject to a vote by the committee, then must be approved by the House and Senate and signed into law by President Obama.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">The effort to audit the Federal Reserve was spearheaded by the Campaign for Liberty, but many RLC members have participated in letter writing campaigns and in-person protests in support of the bill (HR 1207).  In September, the California GOP <a href="http://www.rlc.org/2009/09/28/cagop-audit-fed/" target="_blank">adopted</a> a resolution by RLC members to support HR 1207.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">The bill has over 300 co-sponsors in the House and over 30 co-sponsors in the Senate.<br />
</span></span></span></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/19/financial-svcs-committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RLC-led County Republican Party Proposes Non-Interventionist GOP Platform</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/15/non-intervention-platform/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/15/non-intervention-platform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 03:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RLC Chapter News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RLC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="diggthisplugin" style="float: right; width: 42px; padding-right: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><iframe src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.php?u=http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/15/non-intervention-platform/&t=RLC-led County Republican Party Proposes Non-Interventionist GOP Platform&k=#FFFFFF" scrolling="no" style="border: none; height: 80px; width: 52px;"></iframe>
		</div><p><span style="font-size: small;">The Alameda County Republican Party (ACRP) in California has a history of hostility, lawsuits, and in-fighting.  But the November 17th monthly meeting is shaping up to be a war zone.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Last week, the ACRP Executive Committee gave their approval (4 ayes, 1 no, 1 abstain) to a resolution that would make a non-interventionist foreign policy the official position of the county party.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">To pass, the resolution must receive 2/3rds approval from County Committee members at the November 17th meeting in San Leandro.<br />
</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">The county party is lead by RLC member <strong>Jerry Salcido</strong>, and most of its officers are also RLC members.  Looking at the Alameda County GOP <a href="http://www.alamedagop.org/committee/" target="_blank">Central Committee</a>, I see at least 12-15 RLC members, too.  I guess we&#8217;ll find out if we have a majority on November 17.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Hopefully other county Republican Parties also consider adopting this proposed resolution.<br />
</span></span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Alameda County Republican Party &#8212; Proposed Resolution</strong><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">Submitted by: Walter Stanley III, David LaTour, and Jerry Salcido<br />
</span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">&#8220;Whereas, our foreign policy of the past century is deeply flawed and has not served our national security interests; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, the terrorist threat is a predictable consequence of our meddling in the affairs of others and has nothing to do with us being free and prosperous; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, propping up repressive regimes in the Middle East endangers America and our allies; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, occupying countries such as Iraq and Afghanistan and bombing Pakistan is directly related to the hatred directed toward us; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, losing over 6,000 American Military personnel in the Middle East since September 11, 2001 is not a fair trade off for the loss of nearly 3,000 American citizens, no matter how many Iraqi, Pakistani and Afghan people are killed or displaced; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, torture, even if referred to as “enhanced interrogation techniques” is self-destructive and produces no useful information and that contracting it out to a third world country or a corporation is just as evil; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, war and military spending is always destructive to the economy; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, war time spending is paid for through the deceitful process of inflating and borrowing; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, war time conditions always undermine personal liberty; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, we as small government conservatives see our government’s interventionist foreign policy providing the greatest incentive to expand the government; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, the only logical, conservative position is to reject military intervention and managing an empire throughout the world; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, the official positions for going to war are almost always based on lies and promoted by war propaganda in order to serve special interests; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, the quest for empire eventually destroys all great nations; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, our aggressive foreign policy and seemingly permanent presence in other countries throughout the world has served to weaken our national defense at home; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, the borders’ of Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan are more secure than our own borders here at home; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, our foreign policy has nothing to do with national security and never changes from one administration to the next; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, Christianity teaches peace and not preventive wars of aggression; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, diplomacy is superior to bombs and bribes and the illusion of protecting America; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, the aggressive foreign policy of so called “neo-conservatives” is anything but conservative and has wasted more than $1 trillion on nation building and billions more on foreign aid; and</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Whereas, there is a strong tradition of non-interventionism in the Republican Party that is exemplified by the legacy of Senator Robert Taft and the Old Right.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Therefore, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Alameda County Republican Party supports a non-interventionist foreign policy as advocated by George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, and believes costly undeclared wars and the occupation of other countries only serves to weaken our national defense and strengthen the resolve along with the ranks of our enemies. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p></blockquote>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/15/non-intervention-platform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dr. Rand Paul now leads in Kentucky Republican Primary</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/03/dr-rand-paul-ahead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/03/dr-rand-paul-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="diggthisplugin" style="float: right; width: 42px; padding-right: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><iframe src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.php?u=http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/03/dr-rand-paul-ahead/&t=Dr. Rand Paul now leads in Kentucky Republican Primary&k=#FFFFFF" scrolling="no" style="border: none; height: 80px; width: 52px;"></iframe>
		</div><p><span style="font-size: small;">Kentucky U.S. Senate challenger Dr. Rand Paul, son of RLC Advisory Board member Texas Congressman Ron Paul, is now leading his opponent, former Democrat and Secretary of State Trey Grayson.  A solid analysis is provided from a local Kentucky news station:</span></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="470" height="288" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="AllowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.whas11.com/v/?i=68970162" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="470" height="288" src="http://www.whas11.com/v/?i=68970162" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" allowscriptaccess="always"></embed></object></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/03/dr-rand-paul-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missouri RLC&#8217;er Discusses MIAC Report on &#8220;Freedom Watch&#8221; with Judge Napolitano</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/02/ferguson-with-judge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/02/ferguson-with-judge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 02:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RLC Chapter News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="diggthisplugin" style="float: right; width: 42px; padding-right: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><iframe src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.php?u=http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/02/ferguson-with-judge/&t=Missouri RLC&#8217;er Discusses MIAC Report on &#8220;Freedom Watch&#8221; with Judge Napolitano&k=#FFFFFF" scrolling="no" style="border: none; height: 80px; width: 52px;"></iframe>
		</div><p><span style="font-size: small;">In February, the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC), a “fusion center” that “collects intelligence from both the local agencies and the DHS and uses these combined sources to analyze threats and better combat terrorism and other criminal activity”, labeled some Ron Paul supporters and other constitutionalists as militia members. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Last week, Missouri RLC Board member Mike Ferguson appeared on FOX News&#8217; &#8220;Freedom Watch&#8221; with Judge Napolitano to discuss the status of the MIAC and its report.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">See Mike and the Judge below:</span></span></span></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="560" height="340" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/e2ARIfiT2kQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="560" height="340" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/e2ARIfiT2kQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2009/11/02/ferguson-with-judge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video of Kentucky Senate candidate Rand Paul speaking to RLC members</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2009/10/26/dr-rand-paul-addresses-rlc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2009/10/26/dr-rand-paul-addresses-rlc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heath Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RLC Chapter News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RLC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="diggthisplugin" style="float: right; width: 42px; padding-right: 10px; margin-left: 10px; margin-bottom: 0px;"><iframe src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.php?u=http://www.rlc.org/2009/10/26/dr-rand-paul-addresses-rlc/&t=Video of Kentucky Senate candidate Rand Paul speaking to RLC members&k=#FFFFFF" scrolling="no" style="border: none; height: 80px; width: 52px;"></iframe>
		</div><p><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.randpaul2010.com/">Dr. Rand Paul</a>, who is running in the Republican primary for U.S. Senate against Attorney General and former Democrat Trey Greyson, was the featured guest at an event hosted by Republican Liberty Caucus members in Kentucky. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">This event occurred in Georgetown (near Lexington), Kentucky this past Saturday.  It was hosted by RLC activist Sheryl Ford and longtime Kentucky RLC Coordinator Michael Moreland helped organize it. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">This is the second time in the month of October that Dr. Paul has met with RLC members.  The first was in Northeast Florida, where Dr. Paul met with the Florida RLC Chairman and other RLC members at an event hosted by one of his former medical school classmates.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">The videos of Dr. Paul&#8217;s remarks to RLC members in Georgetown are as follows.  Special thanks to our RLC volunteers in Kentucky for making this event a tremendous success!<br />
</span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Part 1:<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8KHmxrLyxEk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8KHmxrLyxEk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Part 2:<br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fJUFEu62sl4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fJUFEu62sl4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2009/10/26/dr-rand-paul-addresses-rlc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
