<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Republican Liberty Caucus &#187; Transportation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlc.org/category/issues/transportation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlc.org</link>
	<description>The Conscience of the Republican Party</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:11:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cash for Clunkers: Another Blow to Free Enterprise</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2009/08/20/cash-for-clunkers-blow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2009/08/20/cash-for-clunkers-blow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not surprisingly, Obama, the Democrats in Congress, and the complacent Republicans in Congress recently voted to extend and appropriate additional funds to Cash for Clunkers.  The program is just another endless example of a temporary, short-term government solution to a problem that could be solved by the free market.
The late economist Milton Friedman, whose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small;">Not surprisingly, Obama, the Democrats in Congress, and the complacent Republicans in Congress recently voted to extend and appropriate additional funds to Cash for Clunkers.  The program is just another endless example of a temporary, short-term government solution to a problem that could be solved by the free market.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">The late economist Milton Friedman, whose wife Rose sadly passed away earlier this week, used to say that &#8220;nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program.&#8221;  Generally this is true, but &#8212; despite the fact that Congress authorized an additional $2 billion in emergency funding for the bill two weeks ago &#8212; there are <a href="http://www.motorauthority.com/blog/1034458_report-cash-for-clunkers-program-may-be-broke">reports</a> that the Cash for Clunkers program may already be out of cash yet again.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">No problem, since the government has an unlimited source of revenue: namely, We the People.  Another Friedman quote may be better fitting for this particular case: &#8220;If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years there would be a shortage of sand.&#8221;</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Okay, so the Cash for Clunkers program is immensely popular &#8212; so why the criticism? </span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">The program, administered by the the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (you trust them, don&#8217;t you?), was created to help boost the auto industry while helping the environment. </span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Sounds good, right?  Consumers who own a car with low fuel efficiency can receive $3,500 to $4,500 from the federal government if they buy a new car with higher fuel efficiency.</span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron <a href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10418">explains</a> several problems with the program, namely: 1) the program pays people to junk cars that still have economic value; 2) the program will cause an increase in driving; 3) Official government policy favors one industry (automobiles, in this case) at the expense of other industries.  Miron concludes that Congress &#8220;should end the program, not expand it&#8221;.</span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Of course, the government solution does not come without inefficiencies.  <a href="http://www.jsonline.com/business/53229787.html">This article</a> points out that many car dealerships are considering pulling out of the program because they are not receiving payments from the government.  Many of the dealerships understandably need that money to pay their bills and meet their payroll.  Surprise, surprise &#8212; the government is not responding to local car dealerships who are participating in its own program.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Finally, there is today&#8217;s headline in <em>The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel</em>: &#8220;<a href="http://www.jsonline.com/business/53747372.html">Charities worry that car donations will go clunk</a>&#8221; &#8212; which is very concerning.  Talk about a good way to stifle the market &#8212; let&#8217;s just put charities out of business altogether and have the government save us all.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">The article highlights how very worthwhile endeavors such as Kidney Cars Program and the Rawhide Boys Ranch are now competing with the government.  These private charities &#8212; along with scores of others &#8212; both use donated vehicles to raise funds for their programs. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"> This underscores Professor Miron&#8217;s point about the negative impact of the government coming to the rescue of one industry and impacting it to the detriment of other industries. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">A program like Cash for Clunkers is simply not an appropriate role for a constitutionally limited government to administer in a free society. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Cash for Clunkers is a temporary solution that will soon go broke. </span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">We&#8217;ll just have to wait and see how long it takes for the politicians to &#8212; once again &#8212; rescue the overzealous program with the hard-earned dollars of cash-strapped American taxpayers.</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2009/08/20/cash-for-clunkers-blow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic stimulus: map of transportation projects by county</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2009/05/12/economic-stimulus-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2009/05/12/economic-stimulus-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A nationwide map of transportation projects occurring as a result of the Obama- and Congress-approved stimulus is available for you to review HERE. You can click on your state to zoom in.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small;">A nationwide map of transportation projects occurring as a result of the Obama- and Congress-approved stimulus is available for you to review <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/specials/interactives/wdc/stimulus_counties/index.html?SITE=TXDAM">HERE</a>. You can click on your state to zoom in.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2009/05/12/economic-stimulus-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgia RLC Endorses Legislative Measures</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/2009/03/26/georgia-rlc-legislative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rlc.org/2009/03/26/georgia-rlc-legislative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RLC News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Take Action!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Executive Board of the Republican Liberty Caucus of Georgia has endorsed the following measures currently under consideration in the Georgia General Assembly.
•We OPPOSE HB277, SB39, and SR44 &#8211; These measures will levy a 1 percent sales tax, statewide or regionally, for specified transportation projects. The Republican Liberty Caucus of Georgia stands with Governor Perdue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small;">The Executive Board of the Republican Liberty Caucus of Georgia has endorsed the following measures currently under consideration in the Georgia General Assembly.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>•</strong></span><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">We OPPOSE <a href="http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2009_10/sum/hb277.htm">HB277</a>, <a href="http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2009_10/sum/sb39.htm">SB39</a>, and <a href="http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2009_10/sum/sr44.htm">SR44</a> &#8211; These measures will levy a 1 percent sales tax, statewide or regionally, for specified transportation projects. The Republican Liberty Caucus of Georgia stands with Governor Perdue (not often we&#8217;ve said that) in unequivocally opposing any increases in transportation taxes until the DOT is reformed so that the money is not wasted;</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>•</strong></span><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">We OPPOSE<a href="http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2009_10/sum/hb160.htm"> HB 160</a> &#8211; Governor Perdue&#8217;s &#8220;super speeder&#8221; bill to boost fines $200 for drivers exceeding 85 mph on Interstate highways and 75 on other roads. This measure is meant to fund &#8220;Trauma Care&#8221;. While arguable a worthy effort, the RLC-GA opposes the direct funding of any government services through fines or &#8220;sin taxes&#8221;.</span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>•</strong></span><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">We SUPPORT<a href="http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2009_10/sum/hb480.htm"> HB480</a> and <a href="http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2009_10/sum/hb481.htm">481</a> &#8211; JOBS Act to cut taxes on businesses looking to hire workers and relocate to Georgia.</span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>•</strong></span><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">We Support<a href="http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2009_10/sum/sb1.htm"> Senate Bill 1</a> </span></span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">- </span></span></span></span><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;">Zero-based Budgeting which will require the General Assembly to review all spending every four years.</span></span></span></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;">Senate Bill 1 is sponsored by Georgia RLC Adviser Senator David Shafer of Gwinnett County.  Sen. Shafer has been allied with the RLC since he was first elected in 2002.  Next year he intends to run for Lt. Governor.</span><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-size: small;"></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rlc.org/2009/03/26/georgia-rlc-legislative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
