Take Action!


http://american-conservativevalues.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/reince-priebus.jpgWill Reince Priebus exclude Ron Paul and Gary Johnson from the 2012 RNC debates?

Despite the fact that no candidates have formally announced for President, we know that campaign season is upon us because the usual suspects are working to find a way to exclude new ideas from the Presidential debates.

Presidential debates in our country have often been exclusionary, especially since the formation of the Commission on Presidential Debates after Ross Perot’s successful third party campaign in 1992. The Libertarian Party candidate has never been included in a nationally televised debate. Congressman Ron Paul was excluded from at least one debate in Iowa in 2007, but was ultimately included in the important debates. If he had not been included in the debates, both his ideas and his popularity would have suffered as a result. Perhaps the Tea Party never would have formed.

Last week, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus formed a committee comprised of RNC member Jim Bopp, former RNC Chair Mike Duncan, former Florida GOP Chair Al Cardenas, and former Congressman Dick Armey to decide whether the Republican National Committee should sponsor debates to raise money for themselves. According to James Bopp, “The RNC or its designee may at its discretion determine the time, place, co-sponsors, format , subject matter, moderators and participants” for the debates.

Those candidates invited to participate in RNC-sanctioned debates will be allowed to participate in a list exchange with the RNC,wrote Bopp.

And therein lies the problem. Certain candidates will be invited and other candidates will be excluded.

This is exactly what I warned of when I asked you to write your RNC member to oppose the nomination of RNC Chairman Reince Priebus just a few months ago.

The RNC is planning to pick favorites. If conservative talk show host Hugh Hewitt — who thinks this is a grand plan for the Republican Party — has his way, Congressman Ron Paul and Governor Gary Johnson will be excluded from RNC-sanctioned debates. Writes Hewitt:

“Bar the stage to those candidates who simply cannot win the nomination, even under Iowa-upset circumstances. Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., and former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania are long-shots, but they have a plausible path to the nomination. Former Rep. Buddy Roemer of Louisiana and former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson do not. If Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, asks for another giant chunk of valuable time, the RNC should say no, and put up with the howls from the 1 percent who will scream.

Fortunately, some debates are already scheduled, including a May 5 South Carolina debate, a June 7 New Hampshire debate, an August Iowa debate, two debates in Florida in September and October, and the Politico/NBC debate on September 14 in California. However, if the RNC continues with its plan, they could simply adopt some of these debates and begin excluding whomever they want — just as the bipartisan Commission on Presidential Debates excludes third party candidates each Presidential election cycle.

TAKE ACTION

Please contact RNC Chairman Reince Priebus, RNC Chief of Staff Jeff Larson, RNC Committeeman from Indiana Jim Bopp, RNC Committeeman from Kentucky Mike Duncan, FreedomWorks’ Dick Armey, and American Conservative Union’s Al Cardenas. Ask them for inclusive debates that include Congressman Ron Paul, former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, former Louisiana Governor Buddy Roemer, and former Reagan official Fred Karger.

Here is a sample letter:

Dear Committeeman Bopp,

I recently learned that the Republican National Committee is sponsoring its own debates to raise money for the RNC.  I am a Republican party activist and am also involved with my local Tea Party.  I saw conservative commentator Hugh Hewitt comment that certain candidates should be excluded from the RNC-sanctioned debates.

Mr. Bopp, rest assured that I will not donate to the RNC if they exclude candidates like Congressman Ron Paul, Governor Buddy Roemer, or Governor Gary Johnson.  I want to hear as many voices as possible so that the Republican Party can have its best choice to defeat President Obama in 2012.

If your debates are going to be inclusive, then please forge ahead.  However, if you’re going to exclude candidates and ideas from the process, count me out.

Best Regards,

[Your Name]

You may also want to write to Hugh Hewitt to ask him why he believes American voters should be isolated from new ideas and different approaches to solving our problems.

GET INVOLVED

This leads us to the most important point about the discussion: We need more liberty-loving Republicans involved in the Republican Party so our voices can be heard.

Please join the Republican Liberty Caucus today and get involved in your state or local chapter.

If we’re not able to change the Republican Party from within, liberty will lose.

It’s really that simple. We choose to inject libertarian ideas into the party, or we give up. Those are our options.

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the RLC.

Patriots, it’s time to go RINO hunting in beautiful North Dakota!

Yesterday twenty-nine RINOs in the North Dakota State House voted to block an amendment to the state Constitution to prohibit North Dakotans from having to purchase health care.

The bill, HCR 3014, received support from 39 House Republicans but was blocked when 29 RINOs joined with 25 Democrats to kill the modification language.

The amendment is necessary to both strengthen North Dakota’s legal challenge to Obamacare and to protect residents from whatever comes after the courts rule. So why did 29 Republicans, many of them claiming that they’re opposed to Obamacare, vote down this amendment?

Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem (pronounced Sten-jum), Republican.

Stenehjem, a likely candidate for higher office in 2012, did help North Dakota join the federal lawsuit challenging Obamacare. But he has also been working behind the scenes to convince state legislators that North Dakota is powerless in the face of federal law. In February, Stenehjem issued an opinion at the request of legislators in which he concluded that federal laws, once vetted by the states, are the supreme law of the land and that it is unconstitutional for the states to resist them.

Stenehjem has been working with State Rep. Bill Devlin to persuade Republican legislators that they are powerless until the court rules. Their campaign saw success in that it convinced Republican legislators to vote with the bloc of Democrats who supported Obamacare.

In response, please contact Wayne Stenehjem (Republican) at (701) 328-2210 today and express your disgust with his efforts to dissuade legislators from voting the will of their constituents. And please contact Bill Devlin (Republican) to express your feelings about his miseducation campaign in the North Dakota House.

Writes North Dakota blogger Rob Port, “This school of thought is based on a misunderstanding of the supremacy clause. Yes, the Constitution and such laws as the Congress may make are the supreme law of the land, but when the laws Congress makes violate the constitution then they cannot, by definition, be the supreme law of the land. That a federal court may endorse an unconstitutional law doesn’t make it any more constitutional.”

Concludes Port, “With Wayne Stenehjem clearly harboring aspirations for higher office, voters in North Dakota might want to remember just how hard he campaigned against the sovereignty of our state, and just how weakened his campaigning leaves our state in our battle to overturn Obamacare.”

The Republicans who voted against the measure include: Dick Anderson, Thomas Beadle, Dennis Johnson, Stacey Dahl, Duane DeKrey, Bill Devlin, Glen Froseth, Kathy Hawken, Joe Heilman, Curt Hofstad, Jon Nelson, George Keiser, Joyce Kingsbury, Matt Klein, Larry Klemin, Bill Kretschmar, Curt Kruen, Andy Maragos, Bob Martinson, Nancy Johnson, Gary Paur, Vonnie Pietsch, Todd Porter, Raeann Kelsch, Mark Sanford, Wayne Trottier, John Wall, Robin Weisz, David Drovdal

The form at this website will allow you to contact them in one fell swoop.

http://www.legis.nd.gov/images/62/representatives/bdevlin.jpg ……………………………………… http://umarycr.weebly.com/uploads/5/0/1/7/5017927/9980100.jpg?167

Two Republicans, Bill Devlin and Wayne Stenehjem, persuaded 29 Republican legislators to vote against asserting freedom from Obamacare in North Dakota. TAKE ACTION!


The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the RLC.

This week the Texas House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee will hear testimony on HB 1937, one of two bills submitted by Representative David Simpson (R-Longview) to curb unconstitutional searches, violations of privacy and health threats posed by heightened security measures instituted by the Transportation Security Administration.

HB1937 focuses specifically on “enhanced” searches conducted by the TSA, making inappropriate genital and other intimate contact in the course of such a search a state felony in Texas.

HB 1938 prohibits the deployment of dangerous, high-power body imaging machines at airports in Texas.

The Republican Liberty Caucus of Texas supports Rep. Simpson’s efforts to hold the TSA accountable for these abuses of the rights and dignity of our citizens.  If the federal government will not obey the limits which the Constitution puts on its powers then it is entirely appropriate for courageous state legislators like Rep. Simpson to take the lead and challenge this abuse of power on the state level.

“Traveling is not a criminal act. Treating travelers as criminal suspects and forcing innocent citizens to submit to humiliating and unreasonable searches without probable cause as a condition of travel violates protections our forefathers envisioned in Section 9 of the Texas Bill of Rights and the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution,” Rep. Simpson stated. “Contrary to what some TSA agents have claimed, we do not believe that you give up your rights when you travel in public.”

Rep. Simpson was endorsed by the Texas RLC when he ran for office last year and his bills are co-sponsored by 20 other legislators, including RLC endorsees Jason Isaac (R-Dripping Springs),  Jodie Laubenberg (R-Rockwall) and Debbie Riddle (R-Houston).

Bills opposing TSA scanners and pat-downs have already passed in Utah and Alaska and are being submitted in Florida, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and other states.

The Republican Liberty Caucus of Texas has joined a coalition supporting the efforts of Rep. Simpson in opposing the abuses of the TSA.  We urge you to join other pro-liberty Texans and contact your State Representatives on Monday to tell them to support the passage of HB 1937 and HB 1938.  Further information and a convenient form for emailing your legislator can be found at www.stopaustinscanners.org.

There comes a point where government demands too much of our liberty for the security it promises to provide and the TSA has more than passed that point.  Their policies are out of proportion to any real threat posed by terrorism and contrary to the values which define America and Texas.  Please help send them a message they cannot ignore.

Learn more about the Texas RLC at www.rlctx.org.

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the RLC.

It has become a tradition. Every year, dozens of RLCers make the trek to Tallahassee for the annual “Lobby Days at the Capitol” — two days of tangling with legislators, drinking at Clyde’s and Costello’s and getting briefings from economists, grassroots lobbyists and think-tanks.

alt

It is a lot of fun, and camaraderie is always a welcome result. But it is more than just fun.

RLC’ers express the views of the membership on key issues directly to legislators and teach them about the liberty Republican approach to policy. The group chooses issues that emphasize liberty and urges principle over party.  View the 2011 Florida RLC legislative agenda.

This year, the issues agenda was longer than usual and Florida RLC Board member John Hallman helped us press the right issues in the right offices to be most effective as he led 34 of us around the Capitol building.

Top issues included supporting the governor on tough pension reforms, cutting spending and taxes, banning of red light cameras, repealing the REAL ID act, several state sovereignty bills, eliminating mandatory minimum sentencing and repealing the state septic tank inspection program.

Interestingly, Smart Cap — the institutional spending restraint billed as TABOR and Taxpayer Protection Act in the past — was on the list but didn’t engender the same enthusiasm of years past. This idea, which traditionally would limit the growth of state spending or revenues to a combination of inflation and population growth, passed the Senate before RLCers had left town. The Senate bill was pushed by its longtime champion Senate President Mike Haridopolos, but had been watered down with exceptions and even with a padded formula that increased spending in the early years and hence raised the spending trajectory forever. As a result, most of our lobbying on Smart Cap was urging House members to adopt a tougher version.

alt

Another surprise is the interest we found in Tallahassee for medical marijuana. The statewide coordinator for the MedMar referendum effort, new RLC member Kim Russell, joined us as we made our rounds and we discovered several rookie legislators of both parties supported the idea.

altRLC members received a briefing from our chief advisor, FSU professor of economics Randy Holcombe, on several issues. Also, Bob McClure of the James Madison Institute briefed us on the work the Tallahassee-based think tank is currently working on. Additionally, RLC member Greg Newburn of Families Against Mandatory Minimums, as did representatives of Floridians Against REAL ID.

RLC members met with dozens of politicians as a group and individually, as time was provided for us to visit our own legislators. As a group, RLCers met with, among others, Reps. Jimmie T. Smith, Matt Caldwell, Jeff Clemens, Alan Hayes and Sens. Joe Negron, Greg Evers, Scott Plakon, Mike Haridopolos and Don Gaetz.

Pictured: At top, Senate President Mike Haridopolos goes through our legislative agenda commenting and answering questions from RLCers. Next, Rep. Matt Caldwell addresses RLCers about his memorial calling for Congressional term limits and other issues. At bottom, RLC members Bryan Donnelly and Steve Burden listen to FSU professor Randy Holcombe.

A special thanks to Florida RLC Chairman Matt Nye and longtime RLC member Philip Blumel for their efforts to organize the trip.

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the RLC.

The Republican Liberty Caucus of Wisconsin, which supported Governor Scott Walker’s budget proposal and efforts to limit collective bargaining rights for some state employees, is tackling recall and legislative efforts this spring. Specifically:

RLC-WI members are working to collect signatures to recall eight of the 14 Democrat Senators who fled the state to Illinois for 3 weeks throughout February and early March; and

RLC-WI members are rallying support for the legislation being introduced by Washington County legislators Glenn Grothman and Don Pridemore to legalize raw milk sales in the state.

Recall the Wisconsin 14!

The Republican Liberty Caucus of Wisconsin encourages its members to get involved in the recall efforts of eight Democrat Senators who chose to represent Illinois voters rather than Wisconsin voters. If you live in the Stevens Point/Wausau, Green Bay, North Woods, Kenosha, Madison, or Milwaukee areas, it is important to get involved in the recall efforts of the following State Senators. Click the link to be taken to the websites where you can download petitions to circulate.

Recall Jim Holperin
Recall Dave Hansen
Recall Bob Wirch
Recall Julie Lassa
Recall Mark Miller
Recall Spencer Coggs
Recall Lena Taylor
Recall Fred Risser

The goal of the recall efforts is to let the voters weigh in on the decision of the Senators to leave Wisconsin during a critical time in state history.

Legalize Raw Milk

Wisconsin RLC members are also working on a legislative initiative, as it did in 2010, to legalize raw milk in the dairy state. The proposal introduced earlier this week would allow for a licensed dairy farmer to register with the state to sell raw milk and its byproducts directly to consumers. Under current law, only incidental sales of raw milk are allowed. Nine states allow retail sales of raw milk.

Last spring, former Governor Jim Doyle vetoed a proposal that would have allowed farmers to sell their raw milk if there were certain safeguards in place to protect the public. But Governor Scott Walker said in January that he would likely sign a similar bill if it were to come across his desk.

Last May, the Wisconsin RLC sent out a press release supporting the legislation. “Imagine what a positive impact raw milk can have on the economy in our Dairy State,” said state RLC Chairman Michael S. Murphy of Milwaukee.

The Republican Liberty Caucus of Wisconsin was founded in 2009 to promote individual liberty, limited government, and free enterprise within the Republican Party. Learn more about the RLC-WI at http://wi.rlc.org/.

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the RLC.

The Republican Liberty Caucus of Florida has developed a 2011 legislative agenda for its members to pursue.

The agenda, based on the RLC Statement of Principles, will be put into action as Florida RLC’ers attend the annual Lobby Days at the Capitol in Tallahassee today.

The Florida RLC’s legislative agenda is an excellent model for other state RLC chapters to follow and implement.

1. Restore Our Constitutional Rights
_______________________________________

“Sovereignty of the State”: Joint resolution proposing the creation of Section 28 of Article I of the State Constitution, to assert the sovereignty of the state and refuse to comply with unconstitutional federal mandates. Support SJR1438/HJR1103
“Intrastate Commerce Act”: A statute which provides that all goods grown, made or manufactured in Florida and sold within Florida shall not be subject to the authority of the Federal government. Support SB1478
Scope and Exercise of Federal Power to Regulate Commerce: Urge Congress to honor provisions of U.S. Constitution that limit scope & exercise of federal power to regulate commerce. Support HM577
Exercise of Federal Power: Urge the Congress of the United States to honor the provisions of the Constitution of the United States and United States Supreme Court case law which limit the scope and exercise of federal power. Support SM358
Health Care Freedom Act: Creation of S. 28, Art. I of State Constitution to prohibit laws or rules from compelling any person, employer, or health care provider to participate in any health care system. Support SJR2/HJR1
Ban Red Light Cameras: Many studies show how unsafe intersections become after installation of red light cameras, with a dramatic increase in the number of crashes and serious injury. These studies also show cities have been found guilty of shortening the yellow light to increase violations in order to generate revenue. Outside the safety issues raised by installation of these cameras is the constitutionality of the systems. Our Constitution says citizens have a right to face their accuser, yet their accuser in this case is a machine. Support SB672/HB4087
Repeal REAL ID Act: In 2008, the Florida Legislature enacted the REAL ID Act as 4 of 47 sections in a DMV bill. The law required citizens to produce an enormous amount of personal papers to either obtain or renew a Florida driver’s license. This personal information are then seized by the state and scanned into an accessible database. The REAL ID law was forced on the states by the Congress in violation of the US Constitution’s 10th Amendment and violates the Florida Constitution’s 4th Amendment “Right to Privacy”.
Open Carry: Allow concealed-weapons-licensed gun owners to openly carry their weapons. Support SB234/HB517
State Jurisdiction: Limit gun regulation to the state and prohibit all local governments from passing or enforcing gun rules and regulations. Support CS/SB402/CS/HB45
Doctor Prohibition: Prohibit physicians from asking patients about gun ownership. Support SB432/HB155

2. Repeal Unnecessary and Burdensome Regulations
_______________________________________

Online Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems: Eliminates provisions directing DOH to create & administer statewide septic tank evaluation program. Support SB168/HB13
Florida Climate Protection Act: Repeal provisions for Cap & Trade regulatory program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from electric utilities. Support SB762/HB4117

3. Cut Spending and Protect the Taxpayer
_______________________________________

Smart Cap: Amend Florida’s constitution to limit revenues collected by state government to the amount collected the previous year, plus an annual adjustment based on a combination of population growth and the rate of inflation. Any funds in excess of the limits will be placed in the state’s “rainy day fund” until that fund reaches 10 percent of the prior year’s total budget – at that point, the Legislature must vote to either provide tax relief or reduce property taxes.
Stop High Speed Rail/Sun-Rail: The total cost of these rail projects will be devastating to our economy and the tax increases needed to operate the rail projects will take more money from the taxpayers. Spending billions on 1800’s rail technology such as Sun-Rail is a big mistake at a time when the Florida Legislature has to make cuts to essential services. We oppose state funding of rail projects.
Pension Reform: Generous public pension benefits promised a decade or more are now placing significant burdens on many local budgets and although the state pension system isn’t in as bad shape as some other states, it is time to address it now before it does become a problem in the near future. The Florida Legislature should enact common sense reforms such as moving employees into a 401K style defined “contribution” plan. It is reasonable for the state of Florida to require government employees to contribute a portion of their salary into a retirement plan. Florida is currently the only state that does not have this requirement. Support SB1128/SB1130/HB1405
Medicaid Reform: Our current Medicaid program is estimated to cost $20.2 billion this year, approximately 30 percent of our states budget. Sustaining a program that has been over-expanded, combined with new and expensive mandates from Washington from threatens to throw our state into further deficits and requiring more cuts to essential services. Support SB1972
Property Insurance-Reduce Risk to Taxpayers: With Citizens Property Insurance becoming the primary insurer of property in Florida, the Florida taxpayer could be on the hook for billions of dollars if a hurricane of any significance hits Florida. Insuring Florida properties with state dollars will lead to huge debts, and all taxpayers will bear responsibility for that debt. Consumers in Florida would be served best by laws that attract new capital into the state; competition serves consumers better than regulation. Support SB1714/HB1243

4. Term Limits
_______________________________________

Congressional Term Limits: Urge Congress to propose to states amendment to U.S. Constitution to limit terms of office of members of Congress. Support HM685.
Do not extend Florida legislators’ term limits: We believe term limits are the only way to prevent elected officials from becoming entrenched and beholden to special interest groups. We implore you to leave the current term limit for legislators in place. Oppose SJR 300/HJR 207

Learn more about the Florida RLC at www.rlcfl.org.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2607/4187153177_ae1fcb332d.jpg

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the RLC.

Real ID Must Be Implemented By May 11
_____________________________________

There isn’t much current information about REAL ID despite that a major implementation benchmark for the law is scheduled occur in just two months.

The REAL ID Act requires state-issued driver’s licenses and identification cards to meet federal standards by a certain date in order to be accepted for federal purposes, according to the National Council of State Legislatures. The Department of Homeland Security sells REAL ID as a tool “to help prevent terrorism, reduce fraud, and improve the reliability and accuracy of personal identification documents.”

States must now be in full-compliance by May 11, 2011. The penalties for residents in non-compliant states are pretty tame …, or not.

Those innocent, law-abiding citizens will not be able to use their driver’s license to board commercial aircraft, gain access to federal facilities or enter nuclear power plants.

Some Republicans Are Pushing for A National ID Card
_____________________________________

Earlier this week House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX), Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King (R-NY) and Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security Subcommittee Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) sent a letter to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano encouraging her to fully implement the REAL ID Act of 2005.

According to FOX News, REAL ID has won support from many anti-immigration advocates because it requires driver’s licenses issued to immigrants to expire at the same time as their stay in the U.S. and therefore invalidates licenses of immigrants who overstay.

According to former Congressman Bob Barr, a privacy advocate, “A person not possessing a Real ID Act-compliant identification card could not enter any federal building, or an office of his or her congressman or senator or the U.S. Capitol. This effectively denies that person their fundamental rights to assembly and to petition the government as guaranteed in the First Amendment.”

Yet REAL ID is still being implemented. And it’s being implemented despite that half of the states in the country have opted out of REAL ID or have passed resolutions objecting to the national ID law. The Department of Homeland Security has repeatedly extended the deadline and reduced the compliance bar to suggest progress on the national ID effort, according to the Cato Institute’s Jim Harper.

What Can Be Done to Stop REAL ID?
_____________________________________

H.R. 1 is the budget bill Republicans are pushing in the House. If passed, it would would fund the government from March 4 through the September 30. Congressman David Price, a Democrat from North Carolina, proposed Amendment #277 to add the following language to the FY 2011 spending bill:

“None of the funds made available by this Act may be used by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services for the implementation of the REAL ID Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-13).”

This Amendment may be the last opportunity to hit the REAL ID Act before it is thrust onto the American people. While many states have opted out, don’t be so sure that the federal government won’t ignore state opt-outs. It’s much easier for them to implement a national ID card if every state is forced into the plan.

Please ask your members of Congress to support Amendment 277 to H.R. 1. Once implemented, REAL ID will be required by employers to hire you and will restrict your ability to travel in “the land of the free”. It’s imperative that you contact Congress today on this important issue.

(A special thanks to Jim Harper for providing the details on this Amendment.)

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the RLC.

State Representative Ritch Workman, who was endorsed by the Republican Liberty Caucus in his initial campaign for State House in 2008, is working to eliminate stupid laws from Florida’s books. Workman, of Melbourne, is on a mission to obliterate illegalities buried in state law — like smoking clove cigarettes, coasting down hills in neutral, and unmarried couples living in cohabitation or “open adultery” — even if he doesn’t believe in them.

The second-term legislator’s repeal run started in November when House Speaker Dean Cannon told him he wanted to leave office with fewer laws on the books than when he started. Then Gov. Rick Scott made reducing state regulations a top priority, according to The Miami Herald.

Workman, a 37-year-old mortgage broker, asked the local Republican Liberty Caucus (of Central East Florida) to mine the Florida Statutes — five books and an index — for targets. He whittled down the group’s suggestions to seven bills and also gave away a few to colleagues.

(Photo at left: Steve Lindsley, Secretary of the Central East Florida RLC, has been working with State Rep. Ritch Workman to on the repeal effort. Steve is pictured with Gov. Gary Johnson in the photo at left.)

With Republicans holding vast majorities in the House and Senate in Tallahassee and with a liberty-friendly Governor, it’s a good bet there will be fewer Florida statutes on the books at the end of the legislative session.

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the RLC.

Grassroots pro-liberty activists in The Beaver State are hosting an organizational meeting to charter a Republican Liberty Caucus affiliate in Oregon. RLC Coordinator Adam Mayer is leading the charge, so if you live in the Portland area — or anywhere else in the state! — please mark February 19 on your calendar. The meeting details:

Oregon RLC Organizing Meeting
Saturday, February 19 at 1 pm
at Round Table Pizza (10070 SW Barbur Blvd.) in Portland

This will be an organizational meeting to form a Oregon chapter. Bylaws and rules will be voted on and officers will be elected. To participate in voting you must be a member of the RLC. Join today! and join today. For more information e-mail Adam at rlcoregon@gmail.com.

Help promote individual liberty, limited government and free enterprise and eat pizza while doing it! See you on the 19th, freedom fans in Oregon!

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the RLC.

We have about a week to mobilize opposition to Mr. Reince Priebus, frontrunner for RNC National Chairman.

So take five minutes of your time to review the below information, write a polite letter to your RNC Committee members (or ALL of the members), and then forward this message to others who care about our principles.

I received this note from someone in Wisconsin yesterday: “Having experienced the power exercised by Priebus to reject my application to join the Marathon County GOP, I can testify fist hand to how tyrannical a party he would run if in charge at the RNC level. It would be catastrophic for the RNC for him to get the chair. He must be stopped.

Who can stop him? The grassroots, that’s who. Here are some reasons to oppose Mr. Priebus. Below you will also find a sample letter, RNC Contact Information, and related links of interest.

1) The election results in Wisconsin had little to do with Reince Priebus. Wisconsin’s economy suffered under a long period of Democratic control. Voters — led by the 60+ Tea Party groups in the state — were ready for a change. Priebus happened to be in the right place at the right time. Check the 2008 election results in Wisconsin and you’ll see why Priebus had little to do with the 2010 results.

2) Mr. Priebus is not loyal to anyone except Mr. Priebus (and Paul Ryan). This is evidenced by the fact that Michael Steele appointed Mr. Priebus to an important, high-profile post in the RNC, yet Mr. Priebus repaid his friend/ally by stabbing him in the back. This type of behavior does not seem like that of a leader.

3) Mr. Priebus’s employer actively supports Obamacare and has lobbied to receive federal stimulus funds for its clients. Erick Erickson at RedState as well as numerous other authors have exposed Priebus’s support for Big Government. Priebus himself admits he supports REAL ID, a national identification program that will expand surveillance and government power.

4) Mr. Priebus is not qualified to be National Committee Chair. In 2004, he lost his bid for State Senate. In 2007, he became Wisconsin GOP Chair and happened to lead the GOP to success in the 2010 election.  The 2008 election was a disaster for the Wisconsin GOP — also under Priebus’s leadership. He became a lawyer in 1998. Look at the other candidates for RNC Chair and you’ll discover why Priebus’s resume just doesn’t add up.

5) Mr. Priebus does not support the Tea Party. He will use the Tea Party to his own benefit, but there is no evidence that Priebus has shared values with the Tea Party.

6) Mr. Priebus will change Republican National Committee rules to strengthen GOP party bosses to the detriment of primary voters and Tea Party activists. Priebus supports a top-down approach where party bosses decide which candidates should receive support rather than a grassroots, bottom-up approach where voters decide which candidates have earned their trust.

7) Mr. Priebus believes in a GOP “unity pledge” and hopes to use his authority to boot out those who disagree. “A Republican must believe in something,” says Priebus. I don’t think we should leave it up to Priebus to decide who should and should not participate in the Republican Party.

8.) Mr. Priebus re-directed Wisconsin GOP donor monies to his favorite candidates, a clear misuse of donor money. Two candidates for Governor and US Senate in Wisconsin (Scott Walker and Ron Johnson), despite having GOP primary opponents, were endorsed at the 2010 GOP Convention by party insiders — four months prior to Wisconsin’s primary. Wisconsin has a tradition of allowing primary voters to pick its nominees. Under Priebus, this system fell apart — to the detriment of grassroots conservatives and Tea Party voters whose candidates were not given support by party insiders. The establishment candidates selected were given over $700,000 in monies directly sent to the state GOP. Can a state Republican Party redirect money directly to candidates in a contested primary without consent from its donors?

9) Mr. Priebus is not a good spokesman for the Republican Party. His performance in the RNC debate was lackluster and awkward. The audience barely responded to a word he said.

10) Mr. Priebus is the choice of the political establishment — the same people who got our country and our party into this mess. Look who is supporting him.

11) Mr. Priebus will use RNC money to lobby for REAL ID, a de facto National ID card that many states have already opted out of. He admitted this in the ATR/DailyCaller RNC debate.

12) Mr. Priebus is an unapologetic advocate of pre-primary State Party and potentially National Party endorsements. This policy will strengthen party bosses and disempower grassroots activists and Tea Party voters. It also will increase the likelihood that non-conservative establishment candidates will be chosen in GOP primaries, and, as a result, General Elections.

Sample Letter

Dear RNC Committee Member,

Thank you for your service to our party. As an active GOP voter and contributor, I am asking you to oppose Reince Priebus for RNC Chair.

I am very concerned about the consequences of electing Mr. Priebus. We need to maintain the broad political spectrum support that we have gained in the past year through the Tea Party movement. Mr. Priebus is an establishment Republican who would unnecessarily marginalize the Tea Party and grassroots conservatives. His performance in the recent RNC Debate showed not only that he isn’t concerned about grassroots conservatives, but also that he could potentially embarrass the party as its representative. Additionally, a litmus test to be a Republican is absolutely unnecessary at such an important time for our country.

I also urge you to look into his record in Wisconsin. Yes, there were electoral victories, but could the over 60 grassroots Tea Party groups and the right climate (Democrats controlling every level of government, resulting in job loss and overregulation) have been more of a factor than anything Mr. Priebus himself did? The 2008 results in Wisconsin, when Mr. Priebus also served as Chair, were not impressive by any stretch. You’ll also find that his resume pales in comparison to the other candidates for RNC Chair.

The rule changes Mr. Priebus oversaw as GOP Chairman disenfranchised Wisconsin Republican primary voters and the GOP’s pre-primary endorsement did not sit well with the Tea Party groups in the state. As you know, Tea Party groups communicate with each other and once the word spreads, Priebus is going to do more damage to the RNC than his talents are worth.

Mr. Priebus is the wrong choice for the RNC and for grassroots conservatives — especially the Tea Party. We need to capitalize on the gains we have made. Let’s focus on cutting taxes and spending and putting our constitutional principles into practice. A top down approach for the RNC will not achieve our goals — not now.

Thank you for your consideration.

Cordially,
[YOUR NAME]

RNC Member Contact Info.

(Note: Some of this contact information may be outdated. I apologize in advance.)

AK Ralph Seekins
AK Debbie Joslin
AK Randy Ruedrich
AL Paul Reynolds
AL Hon. Bettye Fine Collins
AL The Hon. Mike Hubbard
AR Jim Burnett
AR Reta Hamilton
AR Doyle Webb
AS Te’o Fuavai
AS Hon. Su’a Schuster
AZ Bruce Ash
AZ Sharon Giese
AZ Randy Pullen
CA Shawn Steel
CA Linda Ackerman
CA Ron Nehring
CO Hon. Mark Hillman
CO Lilly Nunez
CO Dick Wadhams
CT Hon. John Frey
CT Pat Longo
CT Chris Healy
DC Tony Parker
DC Betsy Werronen
DC Bob Kabel
DC Ron Kaufman
DE Laird Stabler III
DE Priscilla Rakestraw
DE Tom Ross
FL Paul Senft, Jr.
FL Sharon Day
FL John Thrasher
GA Alec Poitevint
GA Linda Herren
GA Sue Everhart
GU Peter Ada
GU Mary Torres
GU Jesus Torres
HI Jonah-Kuhio Ka’auwai
HI Brennon Morioka
HI Miriam Hellreich
IA Kim Lehman
IA Steve Scheffler
IA Matt Strawn
ID Blake Hall
ID Cindy Moyle
ID Norm Semanko
IL Pat Brady
IL Demetra DeMonte
IL Andrew McKenna
IN James Bopp, Jr.
IN Dee Dee Benkie
IN Murray Clark
KS Mike Pompeo
KS Helen Van Etten
KS Amanda Adkins
KY Mike Duncan
KY Gail Russell
KY Steve Robertson
LA Ross Little Jr.
LA Ruth Ulrich
LA Roger Villere Jr.
MA Jody Dow
MA Peter Torkildsen
MD Louis Pope
MD Honorable Joyce Terhes
MD Alex Mooney
ME Rick Bennett
ME Jan Martens Staples
ME Charlie Webster
MI Saul Anuzis
MI Holly Hughes
MI Ron Weiser
MN Brian Sullivan
MN Evie Axdahl
MN Ron Carey
MO Lance Beshore
MO Ann Dickinson
MO Doug Russell
MP Mary Lou Ada
MP Edward Tenorio
MS Henry Barbour
MS Cindy Phillips
MS Brad White
MT Errol Galt
MT Betti Hill
MT Erik Iverson
NC David Lewis
NC Ada Fisher
NC Linda Daves
ND Curly Haugland
ND Sandy Boehler
ND Gary Emineth
NE Pete Ricketts
NE De Carlson
NE Mark Quandahl
NH Wayne McDonald
NH Phyllis Woods
NH John Sununu
NJ Ginny Haines
NJ Tom Wilson
NM Pat Rogers
NM Rosie Tripp
NM Allen Weh
NV Joseph Brown
NV Heidi Smith
NV Mark Amodei
NY Lawrence Kadish
NY Jennifer Saul
NY Joe Mondello
OH Bob Bennett
OH Jo Ann Davidson
OK James Dunn
OK Carolyn McLarty
OK Gary Jones
OR Solomon Yue, Jr.
OR Donna Cain
OR Vance Day
PA Bob Asher
PA Christine Toretti
PA Rob Gleason, Jr.
PR Hon. Luis Fortuno
PR Zori Fonalledas

PR Hon Carlos Mendez

RI Hon Joe Trillo

RI Hon Carol Mumford

RI Gio Cicione

SC
Glenn McCall
SC Cindy Costa
SC Karen Floyd
SD Dana Randall
SD Mary Jean Jensen
SD Karl Adam
TN John Ryder
TN Peggy Lambert
TN Chris Devaney
TX Bill Crocker
TX Borah Van Dormolen
TX Steve Munisteri
UT Bruce Hough
UT Enid Greene-Mickelsen
UT Stan Lockhart
VT Hon. George Schiavone
VT Susie Hudson
VT Robert Roper
VI Holland Redfield II
VI Lilliana Berlardo De O’Neal
VI Herbert Schoenbohm
VA Hon Morton Blackwell
VA Mrs. Kathy Terry
VA Pat Mullins
WA Jeff Kent
WA Fredi Simpson
WA Luke Esser
WV Jim Reed

WV Donna Lou Gosney
WV Mike Stuart
WI removed
WY Hon. Diemer True
WY Jan Larimer
WY Diana Vaughan

Related Links:
Current RNC Whip Count: Priebus Has 33 Endorsements (1/7)
RedState.com’s Erick Erickson is Concerned About Priebus (1/3)
RedState.com: The Priebus of Disaster (1/3)
Wisconsin Tea Party Group Opposes Reince Priebus (12/6)
American Spectator: Priebus’s Employer Helped Clients Get Federal Stimulus $ (12/15)
BigGovernment.com: Priebus Was Terrible in the RNC Debate (1/5)
Rep. Paul Ryan: Priebus is “front-runner” in race for RNC (1/6)
Connecticut GOP Chair Opposes Priebus (12/31)
Reince: Foe of Tea Party Movement? (12/30)
Jon Stewart Mocks Reince Priebus (1/4)

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the RLC.

« Previous PageNext Page »