Comments on: Extrajudicial Execution Threatens Every Citizen

By: chuck coffer

chuck coffer — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:12:00 +0000

He was a member of alQaeda. No one disputes this. AlQaeda is not a street gang and they are most definitely at war with us, thus we are at war with them. We aren’t enforcing laws by killing alQaeda’s membership. We are eliminating enemy personnel. It is you who don’t “get it” as you say. Making shit up doesn’t change the truth.

By: Dave Nalle

Dave Nalle — Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:19:00 +0000

Chuck. You’re not getting it. There is no “War on Terror” – there are countries where we are at war (which do not include Yemen) and there are terrorists who are criminals or part of criminal orgnizations. Al Awlaki was not part of some enemy army or enemy power. He was a guy with a YouTube channel.

By: chuck coffer

chuck coffer — Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:44:00 +0000

“Al Awlaki did not actually renounce his citizenship.”

Completely irrelevant. Joining and fighting with an enemy army trumps the paperwork. This is settled law and has been for around a hundred years. You people are being dishonest…and dumb.

By: chuck coffer

chuck coffer — Mon, 10 Oct 2011 19:42:00 +0000

“The Constitution either protects us all or it really doesn’t protect anyone.”

In other words, if the constitution doesn’t “protect” members of enemy armies, then it protects no one. The stupidity required to think that let alone write it is beyond words.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 09 Oct 2011 00:12:00 +0000

Our great government was simply protecting not only Al Awlaki’s but each and every American’s right to death.

By: Dave Nalle

Dave Nalle — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:04:00 +0000

Al Awlaki did not actually renounce his citizenship. But regardless, terorrism should be dealt with as the crime that it is, not outside of all legal control through murder and assassination. We’re the US not some banana republic. We have laws and should follow them. That’s what makes us better than they are.

By: chuck coffer

chuck coffer — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:15:00 +0000

It represents a threat to every American who has sworn allegiance to an enemy army and is fighting abroad with same. If this “represents a threat”, then why the hell aren’t you already dead?

By: Ericdondero

Ericdondero — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 03:58:00 +0000

Nasmu, you represent the problem. You’re obsessed with legal bullsh*t. This is simply about revenge. The mother f*cker declared war on the United States of America. He urged others like Major Nidal Hasan to wage war on the U.S. from inside the country.

Okay fine Mr. Muslim dude. We will vaporize the living f*ck out of you in return. And thus we did.

Celebrate it! Glorious victory for America over the Islamic barbarians at the gates. Precious few of those victories under the Islamic-sympathizer Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

By: Ericdondero

Ericdondero — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 03:55:00 +0000

Hey Stephanie, who is “us all”? Awlaki denounced his citizenship repeatedly, and declared Jihad against the United States of America. How is it that he gets to be included in the definition of “us all”?

Does the concept of treason no longer exist in the USA? You can do whatever you want to the U.S. with no consequences at all.

By: Ericdondero

Ericdondero — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 03:54:00 +0000

Dave, here’s a question for ya. Would you be happier if Awlaki was still alive? Would we Americans be better off if he was still alive and kickin’? You have to confront that question Dave, even though it will pain you enormously to do so.