<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP eyes McDonnell strategy: But it&#8217;s missing something!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlc.org/gop-eyes-mcdonnell-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlc.org/gop-eyes-mcdonnell-strategy/</link>
	<description>The Conscience of the Republican Party</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 21:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Dondero</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/gop-eyes-mcdonnell-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2096</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Dondero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1371#comment-2096</guid>
		<description>The McDonnell strategy is sound, but with one glaring flaw; the part that says don&#039;t attack Obama personally.  

Why not?  There are numerous voters out there that are absolutely disgusted that we&#039;ve elected a Chicago thug as President of the United States.  He&#039;s also a guy who has never served a day of his life in the Military - which would be fine if he respected the Military, but he does not.  

Additionally, there are serious unanswered questions about his background; his birth certificate, his 1982 trip to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport, and even his un-released college transcripts.

And then there&#039;s Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, Father Phlager, Louis Farakhan, Frank Wright, and more recently Van Jones.  

Why would voters who are concerned about Obama&#039;s background and lack of personal attributes be fired up about voting for a Republican ticket that treads lightly on all these issues?

We need to attack Obama on policy, sure, but we need to seriously assault him on his personal failings, as well.  Just like they assaulted George W. Bush for 8 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The McDonnell strategy is sound, but with one glaring flaw; the part that says don&#8217;t attack Obama personally.  </p>
<p>Why not?  There are numerous voters out there that are absolutely disgusted that we&#8217;ve elected a Chicago thug as President of the United States.  He&#8217;s also a guy who has never served a day of his life in the Military &#8211; which would be fine if he respected the Military, but he does not.  </p>
<p>Additionally, there are serious unanswered questions about his background; his birth certificate, his 1982 trip to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport, and even his un-released college transcripts.</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, Father Phlager, Louis Farakhan, Frank Wright, and more recently Van Jones.  </p>
<p>Why would voters who are concerned about Obama&#8217;s background and lack of personal attributes be fired up about voting for a Republican ticket that treads lightly on all these issues?</p>
<p>We need to attack Obama on policy, sure, but we need to seriously assault him on his personal failings, as well.  Just like they assaulted George W. Bush for 8 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob wagner</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/gop-eyes-mcdonnell-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2088</link>
		<dc:creator>bob wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1371#comment-2088</guid>
		<description>Yes, but what about the dems. pushing the other moral code down our throuts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but what about the dems. pushing the other moral code down our throuts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raquel Okyay</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/gop-eyes-mcdonnell-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2086</link>
		<dc:creator>Raquel Okyay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1371#comment-2086</guid>
		<description>Time will tell whether McDonnell sticks by his fiscal conservative rhetoric and doesn&#039;t fall into the business as usual category.  I do not think his being a &quot;far right&quot; religious conservative necessarily means he cannot act in a libertarian fashion by working to cut the deficit/spending/programs/ect.  

Even establishment Republicans recognize the wave of anti-big-government sentiment across the country.  You have to give them some credit for saying NO to government controlled healthcare. 

In the districts where Republicans can win, I hope the Party recruits and supports good candidates - they don&#039;t have to be perfect - but good candidates who show commitment to the roots of the Party.  The time is ripe for the Republicans to take back both houses of Congress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time will tell whether McDonnell sticks by his fiscal conservative rhetoric and doesn&#8217;t fall into the business as usual category.  I do not think his being a &#8220;far right&#8221; religious conservative necessarily means he cannot act in a libertarian fashion by working to cut the deficit/spending/programs/ect.  </p>
<p>Even establishment Republicans recognize the wave of anti-big-government sentiment across the country.  You have to give them some credit for saying NO to government controlled healthcare. </p>
<p>In the districts where Republicans can win, I hope the Party recruits and supports good candidates &#8211; they don&#8217;t have to be perfect &#8211; but good candidates who show commitment to the roots of the Party.  The time is ripe for the Republicans to take back both houses of Congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Fish</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/gop-eyes-mcdonnell-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2085</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1371#comment-2085</guid>
		<description>The GOP has been stunned into a sense of denial by the 08 election. They deny the rejection of their status quo position&#039;s. The hope seems to be that the left will screw up enough that the GOP will once again have their turn.For the country, this is a fatally flawed delusion.

 I agree with Aaron, the GOP needs a back to basics approach that most Americans can line up and agree with. Stripped down to it&#039;s bare essence the statement &quot;An Individual has a Right to their Life,Liberty and Property&quot; is that approach.
Their is nothing in that statement an avowed socialist can agree with yet most American&#039;s would.We can find our guidance in the age of enlightenment and the principals of our nation&#039;s founders.
For the ignorant masses the slogan &quot;It&#039;s the constitution stupid&quot; may suffice.

Trying to outbid the Dems for the hearts and minds of the Gimme generation is a path to certian destruction. We must convince people their liberty is more important than a government handout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP has been stunned into a sense of denial by the 08 election. They deny the rejection of their status quo position&#8217;s. The hope seems to be that the left will screw up enough that the GOP will once again have their turn.For the country, this is a fatally flawed delusion.</p>
<p> I agree with Aaron, the GOP needs a back to basics approach that most Americans can line up and agree with. Stripped down to it&#8217;s bare essence the statement &#8220;An Individual has a Right to their Life,Liberty and Property&#8221; is that approach.<br />
Their is nothing in that statement an avowed socialist can agree with yet most American&#8217;s would.We can find our guidance in the age of enlightenment and the principals of our nation&#8217;s founders.<br />
For the ignorant masses the slogan &#8220;It&#8217;s the constitution stupid&#8221; may suffice.</p>
<p>Trying to outbid the Dems for the hearts and minds of the Gimme generation is a path to certian destruction. We must convince people their liberty is more important than a government handout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/gop-eyes-mcdonnell-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1371#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>Interesting article, Aaron. And some good points.

I agree that if Republicans want to win, we have to change our strategy. I like the &quot;Fiscally Conservative, Socially Tolerant and for a Strong Defense&quot; motto I&#039;ve seen. We simply have to stop trying to force what we consider moral behavior down everyone&#039;s throat. We have to stop believing that the FedGov is the answer to everything and get back to letting the States decide a lot of these issues. And as you say, we must return to lower spending and smaller government - our core principles. 

Lately, there has been very little difference at the national level between R&#039;s and D&#039;s - both parties think they are the answer to everything and both are increasing government intrusion into our lives along with spending like drunken sailors! 

We have the reputation of being the Party of NO. This is most likely deserved - at the national level. We just vote against things and don&#039;t propose alternative solutions - at least not in a timely manner. That has to change!

We have to continue to be the Party of NO. No more big spending increases. NO more intrusion in our privacy and erosion of our freedoms and liberty. NO more increasing the deficit. NO more unaffordable entitlement programs. And the list goes on... and on.

Mike Miller
Representative, Montana HD84</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article, Aaron. And some good points.</p>
<p>I agree that if Republicans want to win, we have to change our strategy. I like the &#8220;Fiscally Conservative, Socially Tolerant and for a Strong Defense&#8221; motto I&#8217;ve seen. We simply have to stop trying to force what we consider moral behavior down everyone&#8217;s throat. We have to stop believing that the FedGov is the answer to everything and get back to letting the States decide a lot of these issues. And as you say, we must return to lower spending and smaller government &#8211; our core principles. </p>
<p>Lately, there has been very little difference at the national level between R&#8217;s and D&#8217;s &#8211; both parties think they are the answer to everything and both are increasing government intrusion into our lives along with spending like drunken sailors! </p>
<p>We have the reputation of being the Party of NO. This is most likely deserved &#8211; at the national level. We just vote against things and don&#8217;t propose alternative solutions &#8211; at least not in a timely manner. That has to change!</p>
<p>We have to continue to be the Party of NO. No more big spending increases. NO more intrusion in our privacy and erosion of our freedoms and liberty. NO more increasing the deficit. NO more unaffordable entitlement programs. And the list goes on&#8230; and on.</p>
<p>Mike Miller<br />
Representative, Montana HD84</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Nalle</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/gop-eyes-mcdonnell-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Nalle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1371#comment-2082</guid>
		<description>Unless I read you wrong, there seems to be more profit in courting the Huckabee voters than the Ron Paul voters, which is a very unfortunate sign for the party, because the things which appeal to Huckabee conservatives will drive away independents who might find a more libertarian message appealing.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless I read you wrong, there seems to be more profit in courting the Huckabee voters than the Ron Paul voters, which is a very unfortunate sign for the party, because the things which appeal to Huckabee conservatives will drive away independents who might find a more libertarian message appealing.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/gop-eyes-mcdonnell-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2081</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1371#comment-2081</guid>
		<description>GOP establishment people like McDonnell because they feel his success supports their strategy from the past few years. They feel that &quot;well it wasn&#039;t McCain&#039;s fault, the economy was bad.&quot; Most americans distrust the Republicans on the issue in which they should be the undisputed masters - the economy.  In becoming like the democrats, they forfeited that position, and someone like Obama was able to toy with his rhetoric to sound fiscally conservative and capitalize on the failure of the Republican party in that area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOP establishment people like McDonnell because they feel his success supports their strategy from the past few years. They feel that &#8220;well it wasn&#8217;t McCain&#8217;s fault, the economy was bad.&#8221; Most americans distrust the Republicans on the issue in which they should be the undisputed masters &#8211; the economy.  In becoming like the democrats, they forfeited that position, and someone like Obama was able to toy with his rhetoric to sound fiscally conservative and capitalize on the failure of the Republican party in that area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
