Virginia RLC Pushes Controversial Employment Equality Stance
Filed under GOP Party , Issues , News , RLC Chapter News , RLC News , Social issues , Special Interest , States , Virginia
Yesterday, the Board of the Republican Liberty Caucus of Virginia voiced its support of SB 66, a bill which prohibits different types of discrimination in public employment — including discrimination against same-sex attracted workers. The bill defines “sexual orientation” as a person’s actual or perceived heterosexuality, bisexuality, homosexuality, or gender identity or expression.
Several Virginia RLC members have been vocal on the issue, including David Lampo, who penned an op-ed in The Richmond-Times Dispatch, and RLCVA Board member Rick Sincere, who spoke at a press conference organized by Equality Virginia on the bill’s passage.
Said Lampo in his op-ed, “… Republicans could lose it all again if we let our party go back to the culture wars and religious extremism that some in our party seem to relish. Not only must we resist the divisive urges of the more extreme elements of our party; we need to restore the image of our party to one of social tolerance and support for individual liberty, two of the important values it was built on.”
He continued, “One of the ways to do this is to implement a policy of employment nondiscrimination for all government employees, including gays and lesbians. Virginia currently has no statute establishing a statewide policy against discrimination in employment for any public employees.”
Rick Sincere, a longtime RLC member, spoke on the issue:
The RLC received press hits in the Washington Post, Richmond Times-Dispatch, and Fredricksburg Free-Lance Star. Governor Bob McDonnell has stated repeatedly that he opposes discrimination in state employment, including discrimination based on sexual orientation — affirming the RLC’s position on the issue.





On March 2nd, 2010 at 8:30 pm
It is said “Virginia currently has no statute establishing a statewide policy against discrimination in employment for any public employees.”
Do we really need one? What is wrong with just using a little common sense and remembering the basics? Why isn’t Section 1. of the Constitution of Virginia applicable? ”
Equality and rights of men.
That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their post erity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.”
Actually, people should be extremely careful whose listening when thay say, “There ought to be a law against . . . . ,” because, the next thing you know, a lawyer has heard them and, presto, a law appears which is selectively applied by the legal profession.
Why not eliminate the useless laws so the basics are more apt to be enforced?
Any really liberty minded individual knows that government isn’t the answer, it’s the problem.