<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virginia RLC Pushes Controversial Employment Equality Stance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rlc.org/virginia-rlc-statement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rlc.org/virginia-rlc-statement/</link>
	<description>The Conscience of the Republican Party</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 21:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.rlc.org/virginia-rlc-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-2647</link>
		<dc:creator>C. Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 03:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rlc.org/?p=1839#comment-2647</guid>
		<description>It is said &quot;Virginia currently has no statute establishing a statewide policy against discrimination in employment for any public employees.”

Do we really need one? What is wrong with just using a little common sense and remembering the basics? Why isn&#039;t Section 1. of the Constitution of Virginia applicable? &quot;

Equality and rights of men.

That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their post erity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.&quot;

Actually, people should be extremely careful whose listening when thay say, &quot;There ought to be a law against  .  .  .  .  ,&quot; because, the next thing you know, a lawyer has heard them and, presto, a law appears which is selectively applied by the legal profession.

Why not eliminate the useless laws so the basics are more apt to be enforced?

Any really liberty minded individual knows that government isn&#039;t the answer, it&#039;s the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is said &#8220;Virginia currently has no statute establishing a statewide policy against discrimination in employment for any public employees.”</p>
<p>Do we really need one? What is wrong with just using a little common sense and remembering the basics? Why isn&#8217;t Section 1. of the Constitution of Virginia applicable? &#8221;</p>
<p>Equality and rights of men.</p>
<p>That all men are by nature equally free and independent and have certain inherent rights, of which, when they enter into a state of society, they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their post erity; namely, the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, people should be extremely careful whose listening when thay say, &#8220;There ought to be a law against  .  .  .  .  ,&#8221; because, the next thing you know, a lawyer has heard them and, presto, a law appears which is selectively applied by the legal profession.</p>
<p>Why not eliminate the useless laws so the basics are more apt to be enforced?</p>
<p>Any really liberty minded individual knows that government isn&#8217;t the answer, it&#8217;s the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
