Founded in 1991, the Republican Liberty Caucus works to advance the principles of limited government, free markets and individual liberty within the Republican Party.

There has been a lot of scaremongering about what might happen if Congress doesn’t raise the debt ceiling, which would allow the government to borrow even more money to pay for its inability to spend within its means. While there are many aspects of our budget crisis which should make you scared, the consequences of freezing the debt ceiling is not one of them.

The debt ceiling is a legislatively-set limit on how much money the government is willing to borrow to add to the deficit. Right now it is capped at $14.1 trillion and we are right up against that limit. Each month we add about $40 billion to the total defici. That means we spent $41 billion more in the month than the government took in as revenue during that month. That overage is about 13% of total spending for the month.

So when we reach that $14.1 billion cap, only the 13% of total government spending which is paid with borrowed money would be in jeopardy. Eighty seven percent (87%) of what the government does would not be impacted at all. The president and the Treasury Department would then have to decide where to cut spending to cover that 13% over incoming revenue.

The scare tactic here is the claim that the response to this would be to default on our debts, thereby destroying the nation’s credit and leading to a plunge in all of our financial markets. The fallacy is that capping spending doesn’t mean there isn’t still money to spend. The government would still have plenty of incoming revenue and the ability to prioritize how it spends that money.

Interest on the debt is about half as much right now per month as the amount of deficit per month. To keep from defaulting, the government would just need to make sure that the 6.5% of the budget which goes to interest is part of the 87% which is paid rather than the 13% which needs to be cut.

We would only default on the debt if the president and his staff at the Treasury Department deliberately chose to pay other bills and not pay the interest. They’re unlikely to do that and provoke the crisis it would create and would reluctantly cut elsewhere instead. In fact, just to be safe, RLC-endorsed Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA) has introduced the Full Faith and Credit Act, which would require that debt service be paid first before other spending just to guarantee that we would not default. So if we chose to not raise the debt ceiling, defaulting on the debt would not be one of the outcomes.

Other scare tactics include claiming that Medicaid or Medicare or pensions or veterans programs or other vital services would be cut. But, again, that would be at the discretion of the executive branch. It would not be at all difficult to cut the necessary money without touching those programs, especially in the short term. You just need to find about $40 billion a month to cut — that’s less than 1.5% of the total budget.

Just ending the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya would save enough money to keep us from going over budget for almost a year. The rest could easily be made up with smaller cuts. For example, RLC-endorsed Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) has identified $42 billion we could cut from agricultural programs. That would buy us another month. He has also suggested $16 billion in cuts to the Commerce Department and $27 billion in cuts to the Department of Energy. Add those and you’ve bought more than a month more without even shutting those departments down.  Measures like furloughing federal workers one day a week could buy even more time, so the crisis is nowhere near as immediate as some would like you to think.

Congress has already raised the debt ceiling three times in the last two years. That level of growth in borrowing and spending is absolutely unsustainable. Right now our deficit actually seems relatively small at an anual rate of 15%, but projections show it ballooning to 40% of the current budget within a decade. That’s what we should really be afraid of, not a cap on spending which would just necessitate some reasonable spending cuts.

The only way to stop that explosion of debt is to stop borrowing and start paying back what we already owe. The first step towards that objective is to not raise the debt ceiling. Congress and the executive branch have already shown that, if you give them money, they will spend it. If they cannot be responsible then maybe we can force them to control themselves by not giving them any more money.

The views expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect official positions of the RLC.

10 Comments to “What if We Don’t Raise the Debt Ceiling?”

Subscribe to comments with RSS

  1. Victor Klaput said:

    I do not want the government to rise the debt ceiling or income taxes.  The government gets too much money as it is.  Put a balanced budget amendment and a term limit amendment in the Constitution 

  2. Victor Klaput said:

    I do not want the government to rise the debt ceiling or income taxes.  The government gets too much money as it is.  Put a balanced budget amendment and a term limit amendment in the Constitution 

  3. TheFanNJ: Omar Dyer said:

    At victor by going into default is even worse than raising the Debt ceiling. You can always create innovation, and spur job growth to pay down a debt. Yet, when you default, removing that level of uncertian image–you will have troubles with paying down debt. 

  4. TheFanNJ: Omar Dyer said:

    At victor by going into default is even worse than raising the Debt ceiling. You can always create innovation, and spur job growth to pay down a debt. Yet, when you default, removing that level of uncertian image–you will have troubles with paying down debt. 

  5. SirWilhelm said:

    You mean if we don’t raise our own debt ceiling, our creditors won’t lend us anymore money? Hmm. When I hit my debt ceilings on my credit cards, I can’t run up anymore debt either, and I have to stop spending money I don’t have. It looks like the government can vote it’s way around it, how convenient! That means they never have to stop spending OUR money! Seeing I can’t borrrow any money myself, I don’t want the government spending borrowed money anymore. Don’t raise the debt limit! 

  6. SirWilhelm said:

    You mean if we don’t raise our own debt ceiling, our creditors won’t lend us anymore money? Hmm. When I hit my debt ceilings on my credit cards, I can’t run up anymore debt either, and I have to stop spending money I don’t have. It looks like the government can vote it’s way around it, how convenient! That means they never have to stop spending OUR money! Seeing I can’t borrrow any money myself, I don’t want the government spending borrowed money anymore. Don’t raise the debt limit! 

  7. Tell Congress to Hold the Line on Debt | Republican Liberty Caucus said:

    [...] in over your head. Congress doesn’t seem to understand this. They’re getting ready to raise the Debt Ceiling and write themselves another blank check. The problem is that when they run up debt we pay the [...]

  8. Bonita said:

    Why in the world does any one think by borrowing more you can get out of debt. Do not raise the debt ceiling you bunch of crooks…..

  9. Dollar Bill said:

    My Xwife spent like the Federal Government. Another reason why she’s the X.

  10. TMLutas said:

    The only problem with halting the debt growth by not raising the debt ceiling is that it’s going to be disorderly. The Obama administration does not seem to have a real plan B of what to do if they don’t get additional borrowing authority. What *should* happen is that the worst, least beneficial, and least efficient initiatives get the ax and the cream of the government spending crop continues to get funded. I have no confidence that they’ve even made a list like that.

    That means that those in the executive with clout will have money sent their way and those without, no matter how vital their expenditures, will go without. A lot of excess pain will result, putting unnecessary stress on people and political pressure to open up the money spigots again.